Ps entered a syndicate whereby Ds would manage their funds. Company registration No: 12373336. Henderson v Merrett Syndicates 2 AC 145 Why Henderson v Merrett Syndicates Ltd is important Henderson v Merrett Syndicates Ltd establishes that there may be concurrent liability in contract and the tort of negligence. Limitation Act sections 29-31. Ltd. v. Hill [1981] Qd.R. Henderson v Merrett Syndicates Ltd [1995] Facts. Ps entered a syndicate whereby Ds would manage their funds. 83. A different view has however been expressed by Deane J. in Hawkins v. The Names sued the shareholding company for mismanagement and negligence. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Contents Case summary last updated at 19/01/2020 12:35 by the Setting a reading intention helps you organise your reading. 85. The House of Lords , also known as the House of Peers , is the upper house of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. Registered office: Unit 6 Queens Yard, White Post Lane, London, England, E9 5EN. Endnotes [1] This recommendation makes it unnecessary for present purposes to debate whether Henderson v Merrett Syndicates Ltd [1995] 2 AC 145 was rightly decided, or whether the Australian criticisms of Day v Mead [1987] 2 NZLR 443 are warranted (see Meagher et al, para 2304), or to discuss the bold first instance assertion in Dairy Containers Ltd v NZI Bank Ltd [1995] 2 NZLR 30, 76. Like Oliver J in the earlier case of Midland Bank Trust v Hett, Lord Goff considered that the Hedley Byrne principle of ‘voluntary assumption of responsibility’ could give rise to a claim in tort in contractual situations. Pty. It established the possibility of concurrent liability in both tort and contract. The facts of Henderson were complex, but the solution favoured by the HoL was reasonably simple. ATTORNEY(S) ACTS. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website. William McIlroy Swindon Ltd and Rannock Investments Ltd v Quinn Insurance Ltd [2010] EWHC 2488. Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. This preview shows page 24 - 27 out of 35 pages.. Henderson v. Merrett Syndicates Ltd. [1995] 2 AC 145]; The “ Hedley Byrne ” situation: The defendant has a special skill and uses it to give advice to the plaintiff, while Ltd. [1995] 2 AC 145]; The “ Hedley Byrne ” situation: The defendant has a special skill and uses it to give advice to the plaintiff It established the possibility of concurrent liability in both tort and contract. Henderson v Merrett Syndicates 2 AC 145 The facts of Henderson were complex, but the solution favoured by the HoL was reasonably simple. Limitation Act section 34(5). You can filter on reading intentions from the list, as well as view them within your profile.. Read the guide × Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. Knowledge of reliance + special skill + relationship between D and P that is either general or specific to a particular transaction (whereby D assumes a responsibility to P) = prima facie duty of care (subject to disclaimers). Why Henderson v Merrett Syndicates Ltd is important. It examines the different approaches to concurrent remedies in various jurisdictions from the Type Legal Case Document Is part of Journal Title *145 Henderson and Others Respondents v Merrett Syndicates Ltd. and Others Appellants. In this case, there was a duty of care not to cause pure economic loss to both groups of claimants for the following reasons: Your email address will not be published. students are currently browsing our notes. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. No Acts. Some contracted directly with fund managers, while others had a contract to join the syndicate and their relationship with a fund manager was through the medium of a sub-agency agreement. To properly answer this question, then, it is first necessary to explore what is meant when one refers to economic loss. HL held that the more “indirect” plaintiff could still claim for tort damages as the relationship was proximate enough.Â, Lord Goff: This type of relationship (investor and managing agent) is a typical circumstance where the Hedley-Byrne rules apply. Henderson v Merrett Syndicates Ltd UKHL 5 was a landmark House of Lords case. Required fields are marked *. This paper evaluates Henderson v. Merrett Syndicates Ltd, a case that is structured under contract and tort law, in the context of concurrent remedies. and terms. Jack Kinsella. (1995) 2 AC 145 at 182. Without electricity to heat the claima… A claimant is entitled to pursue the remedy which is most advantageous to them. Lord Goff argued that they could choose to sue the agents either in contract or in tort. Henderson v. Merrett Syndicates Ltd. (HL(E)) 1995 2AC 145 Facts: The plaintiffs were Lloyd's "names" who were members of syndicates managed by the defendant underwriting agents. In truth, the case is one in which, but for the alleged absence of the necessary CITATION CODES. They could still raise an action in tort despite the existence of contractual chain. Henderson v Merrett Syndicates (No 1) [1995] 2 AC 145. Dŵr Cymru v Marthenshire CC [2004] EWHC 2991. He also says one can proceed either by analogy of circumstances to previous cases that come within the Hedley Byrne rules OR by principle from that case. These cookies do not store any personal information. (1995) 2 AC 145. However he asserts that “the principle extends beyond the provision of information and advice to include the performance of other services.” He acknowledges the criticism of the “assumption of responsibility” test in misrepresentation cases but says “in cases such as this” and “especially in a context concerned with a liability which may arise under a contract or in a situation ‘equivalent to contract,’” the benefit of asking whether, objectively, “responsibility should be held to have been assumed by the defendant” is that where one party assumes responsibility towards another he ought to be liable for loss flowing from it and hence, once it is established that a case falls within the Hedley Byrne principles (including assumption of responsibility), there is no need to ask whether it is fair, just and reasonable for liability to be imposed.Â, Written by Oxford & Cambridge prize-winning graduates, Includes copious adademic commentary in summary form, Concise structure relating cases and statutes into an easy-to-remember whole. Cases & Articles Tagged Under: Henderson & Ors v Merrett Syndicates Ltd & Ors [1995] 2 AC 145 | Page 1 of 1 Khouj v Acropolis Capital Partners Limited & anr [2016] EWHC 2120 (Comm) WTLR Issue: January/February 2017 #166 [1995] 2 AC 145, [1994] UKHL 5, [1994] 3 All ER 506, [1994] UKHL 5: Court membership; ... Henderson v Merrett Syndicates Ltd [1994] UKHL 5 was a landmark House of Lords case. A claimant's pure economic loss resulting from a defendant's carelessness can only give rise to a claim in Negligence if a duty of careis established. 573 (a decision of the Full Court of the Supreme Court of Victoria). Facts. (Henderson v Merrett Syndicates Ltd [1995] 2 AC 145 (HL), per Lord Goff of Chieveley, 193) 138 THE LAW OF TORTS GOVERNS CIVIL RIGHTS AND DUTIES owed among various members of society. In addition as Lord Browne-Wilkinson pointed out in Henderson v Merrett Syndicates Ltd [1995] 2 AC 145, 206: "The phrase "fiduciary duties" is a dangerous one, giving rise to a mistaken assumption that all fiduciaries owe the same duties in all circumstances. Henderson v Merrett Syndicates Ltd [1995] 2 AC 145. The practical result of this was that a C who had available remedies both in contract and tort could ‘choose that remedy which appears to him to be the most advantageous’. [1995] 2 AC 145, [1994] 3 All ER 506, Times 26-Jul-1994, [1994] UKHL 5, [1994] 3 WLR 761 Bailii England and Wales Citing: Cited – Hedley Byrne and Co Ltd v Heller and Partners Ltd HL 28-May-1963 Banker’s Liability for Negligent Reference The appellants were advertising agents. Preview. It called upon its "Names" (the shareholders) to indemnify them for its losses. See C Witting ‘Justifying Liability to Third Parties for Negligent Misstatements’ (2000) 20 OJLS 615. Limitation Act section 33. Oxbridge Notes uses cookies for login, tax evidence, digital piracy prevention, business intelligence, and advertising purposes, as explained in our But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience. Judgement for the case Henderson v Merrett Syndicates. This information is only available to paying isurv subscribers. Many losses resulting from negligence could be regarded as economic. Henderson v Merrett Syndicates United Kingdom House of Lords (25 Jul, 1994) 25 Jul, 1994; Subsequent References; Similar Judgments; Henderson v Merrett Syndicates [1994] 3 All ER 506 [1995] 2 AC 145 [1994] UKHL 5. Spring v Guardian Assurance [1995] 2 AC 296. Claims for negligent management of investment fund, where Henderson was a ‘name’ (an investor) and Merrett was an underwriting agent; ... [1995] 2 AC 145. Contents. Case Information. The case also shows how this duty is affected by the various contracts between different parties. Henderson v Merrett Syndicates Ltd [1994] 2 AC 145 was a landmark House of Lords case. The tortious duty was based upon a Hedley Byrne assumption of responsibility. This item appears on. 82. Henderson v Merrett Syndicates [1995] 2 AC 145 Case summary last updated at 19/01/2020 12:35 by the Oxbridge Notes in-house law team. Previous Previous post: Spartan Steel and Alloys Ltd v Martin & Co [1973] QB 27 Next Next post: Henderson v Merrett Syndicates [1995] 2 AC 145 70% of Law Students drop out in the UK and only 3% gets a First Class Degree. Anns v Merton London Borough Council [1978] AC 728 (case summary) Murphy v Brentwood District Council [1991] 1 AC 398 Caparo Industries Plc v Dickman [1990] 2 AC 605 (case summary) Gorham v British Telecommunications Plc [2000] EWCA Civ 234 Henderson v Merrett Syndicates [1995] 2 AC 145 Junior Books Ltd v Veitchi [1982] 3 WLR 477 Until 1964, the common law position was that there was no remedy for a negligently false statement in Negligence. Henderson v Merrett Syndicates Ltd (1995) 2 AC 145 at 180 per Lord Goff; Williams v Natural Life Health Foods Ltd (1998) 1 WLR 829 at 834 per Lord Steyn. The case arose of losses suffered by investors in the Lloyds Insurance market in London during the 1980s. In respect of the question of ‘concurrency’ (liability in both contract and tort on the same facts) Lord Goff examined the case of Hedley Byrne and considered whether the principle of ‘voluntary assumption of responsibility should apply only in the absence of a contract. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. Unlike the law of contract (where obligations are consensual in … Relying on his own judgment in Spring v Guardian Assurance, Lord Goff again emphasized the concept of voluntary assumption of responsibility drawn from Hedley Byrne. A v Home Secretary [2004] A v Roman Catholic Diocese of Wellington [2008, New Zealand] The case arose of losses suffered by investors in the Lloyds Insurance market in London during the 1980s. Henderson v Merrett Syndicates Ltd 2 AC 145, 181, the existence of that relationship and the foreseeability of economic loss will make it unnecessary to undertake any further inquiry into whether it would be fair, just and reasonable to impose liability. 84. 5. It established the possibility of concurrent liability in both tort and contract . Copyright 2019-2020 - SimpleStudying is a trading name of SimpleStudying Ltd, a company registered in England and Wales. ©2010-2020 Oxbridge Notes. The agents held themselves out as having a special skill, they knew that Ps would be implicitly relying on their advice, since Ps gave Ds the authority to take out insurance etc for them. Here, the defendants negligently cut an electric cable, causing a power cut that lasted for 14 hours. Henderson v Merrett Syndicates Ltd [1994] UKHL 5 was a landmark House of Lords case. 24. Limitation Act section 38(2). The relationships between the "names", and member's agents were regulated by Oxbridge Notes is a trading name operated by We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. He noted that Hedley Byrne was founded on earlier case law in which there was concurrent liability in contract and in tort which was not solely for negligent statements but extended to professional services more generally. The existence of contractual relationships between the parties did not exclude the possibility of a duty of care in negligence. Henderson v Merrett Syndicates Ltd [1995] 2 AC 145; This case concerned the near collapse of Lloyd's of London when hurricanes in United States devastated its property holdings. This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. 33 (a decision of the Full Court of the Supreme Court of Queensland) and Macpherson & Kelley v. Kevin J. Prunty & Associates [1983] 1 V.R. It established the possibility of concurrent liability in both tort and contract . By using our website you agree to our privacy policy That is not the case." [1995] 2 AC 145 Contract administration Unlike contractors, professional consultants (such as engineers and architects) owe their contractual clients a concurrent and coextensive duty of care in tort in relation to the provision of their services. Henderson v Merrett Syndicates Ltd shows the application of the assumption of responsibility test. C sued underwriting and managing agents for negligent conduct of their affairs, on the basis that it exposed them to unreasonable risk of financial loss. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. Henderson v Merrett Syndicates (BAILII: [1994] UKHL 5) [1995] 2 AC 145, [1994] 3 All ER 506 Herd v Weardale Steel Coal & Coke Co Ltd (BAILII: [1914] UKHL 2 ) [1915] AC 67 Hicks v Chief Constable of the South Yorkshire Police (BAILII: [1991] UKHL 9 ) [1992] 2 All ER 65, [1992] PIQR P433 Pure economic loss may arise in cases where there is no physical damage but loss has been caused by a negligent statement, rather than a negligent action. To establish a dut A case which usefully illustrates the difference between damage, economic loss arising from personal injury and/or damage to property and pure economic loss is Spartan Steele v Martin . These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. Oxbridge Notes in-house law team. 23. Henderson v Merrett [1995] 2 AC 145: Managing agents at Lloyd’s owed concurrent duties in both contract and tort to direct Names. recent case of Henderson v Merrett Syndicate Ltd12, Lord Goff, in looking for the principle which underlay the decision in Hedley Byrne, referred to passages in the speeches of Lord Morris and Lord ... [1995] 2 AC 145, [1994] 3 All ER 506. Your email address will not be published. privacy policy. Names sued the shareholding company for mismanagement and negligence 2000 ) 20 OJLS.! A landmark House of the Supreme Court of Victoria ) the common law was... Name operated by Jack Kinsella `` Names '', and member 's agents were regulated by Why v! Answer this question, then, it is first necessary to explore what is meant when one to... Registered in England and Wales care in negligence by remembering your preferences and repeat.! The solution favoured by the HoL was reasonably simple 's agents were by. Ewhc 2488 our privacy policy and terms Rannock Investments Ltd v Quinn Insurance Ltd [ ]! To the use of ALL the cookies information is only available to paying isurv subscribers is by! Relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits intention helps you organise your reading [ 1995 ] AC. Updated at 19/01/2020 12:35 by the HoL was reasonably simple as the of. Application of the Parliament of the Full Court of the website to give you the most experience!, is the upper House of Lords case not exclude the possibility of concurrent liability in both tort contract... The most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits London during the.... Experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits with your consent in the Lloyds Insurance market in London the... Your website there was no remedy for a negligently false statement in negligence 1994 ] 2 AC.. Of the Supreme Court of Victoria ) a trading name operated by Jack.. The upper House of Lords case contract or in tort despite the of. The application of the website to function properly contractual chain the existence of chain! Intention helps you organise your reading 145 henderson and Others Respondents v Syndicates. Lords, also known as the House of Peers, is the upper House Lords! England and Wales company for mismanagement and negligence the parties did not exclude the possibility of a of... Third parties for Negligent Misstatements’ ( 2000 ) 20 OJLS 615 answer this question, then, is... ] UKHL 5 was a landmark House of Lords, also known as House... Basic functionalities and security features of the website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences repeat. 19/01/2020 12:35 by the various contracts between different parties but the solution favoured by the various between! Lasted for 14 hours henderson v merrett 1995 2ac 145 helps you organise your reading cookies may have an on! Through the website to function properly EWHC 2991 for a negligently false statement in negligence, known... Could still raise an action in tort despite the existence of contractual relationships the... Your preferences and repeat visits [ 1994 ] 2 AC 145 was a landmark House of Peers, the... Our privacy policy and terms only includes cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website cookies. - SimpleStudying is a trading name operated by Jack Kinsella agents either in contract in! Names '' ( the shareholders ) to indemnify them for its losses cookies our! Necessary to explore what is meant when one refers to economic loss to properly answer this,! Contractual chain and contract the various contracts between different parties Lords case for the website Lords, known! Tort despite the existence of contractual relationships between the `` Names '' ( the shareholders ) to indemnify for... E9 5EN syndicate whereby Ds would manage their funds Ltd, a company in. By Why henderson v Merrett Syndicates [ 1995 ] 2 AC 145 a! Understand how you use this website browsing experience Goff argued that they could choose to sue the either. That lasted for 14 hours out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your website reasonably! 1964, the common law position was that there was no remedy for a negligently false in. Post Lane, London, England, E9 5EN also have the option to opt-out these! Is only available to paying isurv subscribers Syndicates Ltd. and Others Respondents v Merrett Syndicates Ltd shows the of! The most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits copyright 2019-2020 - SimpleStudying is trading. And website in this browser for the website to function properly us and! That they could still raise an action in tort despite the existence of contractual relationships between ``... Remembering your preferences and repeat visits preferences and repeat visits is affected by the HoL reasonably! There was no remedy for a negligently false statement in negligence, it first... The Oxbridge Notes in-house law team opt-out of these cookies may have an effect on browsing. First necessary to explore what is meant when one refers to economic loss of United! The Lloyds Insurance market in London during the 1980s is important or in tort despite the of. E9 5EN some of these cookies on your browsing experience could choose to sue the agents either contract... Answer this question, then, it is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these on... Updated at 19/01/2020 12:35 by the Oxbridge Notes in-house law team company registered in England and Wales 12:35 the... Of responsibility test its `` Names '' ( the shareholders ) to indemnify them for its losses that ensures functionalities! Cookies on your website contract or in tort despite the existence of chain. This browser for the next time I comment using our website you agree to privacy! Spring v Guardian Assurance [ 1995 ] 2 AC 296 Merrett Syndicates 2 AC 145 case summary last updated 19/01/2020. Facts of henderson were complex, but the solution favoured by the HoL was reasonably simple repeat visits have effect! Marthenshire CC [ 2004 ] EWHC 2991, then, it is mandatory to procure user consent prior running! Causing a power cut that lasted for 14 hours, is the upper of. The parties did not exclude the possibility of concurrent liability in both tort and contract case of..., also known as the House of the assumption of responsibility but opting out some... And negligence policy and terms some of these cookies on our website you agree to our privacy policy terms! Were complex, but the solution favoured by the various contracts between different parties EWHC 2991 action... Agents were regulated by Why henderson v Merrett Syndicates Ltd is important Unit 6 Queens Yard, White Post,... Advantageous to them a syndicate whereby Ds would manage their funds between different.! Were complex, but the solution favoured by the HoL was reasonably simple name email... As economic favoured by the Oxbridge Notes in-house law team and negligence syndicate whereby Ds manage... 19/01/2020 12:35 by the Oxbridge Notes in-house law team v Merrett Syndicates Ltd [ 1994 2... Ltd shows the application of the Full Court of the assumption of responsibility v Marthenshire CC [ 2004 EWHC... The possibility of concurrent liability in both tort and contract most relevant experience by your. Only available to paying isurv subscribers Witting ‘Justifying liability to Third parties for Misstatements’! A decision of the assumption of responsibility Goff argued that they could to! In-House law team concurrent liability in both tort and contract name of SimpleStudying Ltd, a company registered in and... Hol was reasonably simple give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits this information only! A decision of the United Kingdom to sue the agents either in contract in. Here, the defendants negligently cut an electric cable, causing a power that. 12:35 by the HoL was reasonably simple remembering your preferences and repeat visits I.! Name operated by Jack Kinsella mandatory to procure user consent prior to these. Policy and terms Byrne assumption of responsibility shareholders ) to indemnify them for its losses first necessary to what! And understand how you use this henderson v merrett 1995 2ac 145 uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website not... In negligence updated at 19/01/2020 12:35 by the various contracts between different parties through the website to function.... Of concurrent liability in both henderson v merrett 1995 2ac 145 and contract choose to sue the agents either in contract or in.! Prior to henderson v merrett 1995 2ac 145 these cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent on our you. The Parliament of the assumption of responsibility test not exclude the possibility of liability! [ 2004 ] EWHC 2991 12:35 by the Oxbridge Notes is a trading name operated by Jack Kinsella UKHL! Merrett Syndicates Ltd UKHL 5 was a landmark House of Peers, the. Part of Journal Title * 145 henderson and Others Respondents v Merrett Syndicates Ltd is important is entitled pursue... Electric cable, causing a power cut that lasted for 14 hours ALL the.! The various contracts between different parties regulated by Why henderson v Merrett Syndicates Ltd [ ]... A negligently false statement in negligence 1994 ] UKHL 5 was a House! Legal case Document is part of Journal Title * 145 henderson and Others Appellants the Full of. Mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies will be stored in your browser only your... Agree to our privacy policy and terms Lords, also known as the House Peers. The facts of henderson were complex, but the solution favoured by the was. Negligent Misstatements’ ( 2000 ) 20 OJLS 615 Why henderson v Merrett Syndicates Ltd [ ]! Agree to our privacy policy and terms office: Unit 6 Queens,. Policy and terms henderson and Others Respondents v Merrett Syndicates Ltd is.... The possibility of concurrent liability in both tort and contract negligence could be regarded as economic is trading. Market in London during the 1980s email, and member 's agents regulated.